nanog mailing list archives
Re: enom giving Google a bad name
From: Hank Nussbacher <hank () interall co il>
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2022 20:33:29 +0200
On 16/01/2022 19:57, Rubens Kuhl wrote:
On Sun, Jan 16, 2022 at 2:38 PM Hank Nussbacher <hank () interall co il> wrote:Many of you might be following the enom weekend fiasco: https://twitter.com/enomsupport/status/1482621466151571456 https://twitter.com/enomsupport/status/1482707275529678849 https://enomstatus.com/ Thousands of domains have been knocked out.Because they used URL redirection services, right ? Domains under management are unlikely to be affected unless the registrant needs a domain update.
From what I see enom's nameservers are down. -Hank
Current thread:
- enom giving Google a bad name Hank Nussbacher (Jan 16)
- Re: enom giving Google a bad name Rubens Kuhl (Jan 16)
- Re: enom giving Google a bad name Hank Nussbacher (Jan 16)
- Re: enom giving Google a bad name Rubens Kuhl (Jan 16)
- Re: enom giving Google a bad name Jay Hennigan (Jan 16)
- Re: enom giving Google a bad name Hank Nussbacher (Jan 16)
- Re: enom giving Google a bad name Rubens Kuhl (Jan 16)
- Re: enom giving Google a bad name Peter Beckman (Jan 16)