nanog mailing list archives
Re: Slack.com DNSSEC on Feb 12th 15:00 UTC
From: William Herrin <bill () herrin us>
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2022 08:17:48 -0800
On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 7:55 AM Bjørn Mork <bjorn () mork no> wrote:
So why the heck do you insist on keeping that wildcard? Nobody else use wildcard A records. There is no reason. It's a loaded footgun.
Okay... I know some of the bad things that can happen with CNAMEs. What exactly is the problem with wildcard A records and DNSSEC? Regards, Bill Herrin -- William Herrin bill () herrin us https://bill.herrin.us/
Current thread:
- Slack.com DNSSEC on Feb 12th 15:00 UTC Rafael Elvira via NANOG (Feb 04)
- Re: Slack.com DNSSEC on Feb 12th 15:00 UTC Bjørn Mork (Feb 04)
- Re: Slack.com DNSSEC on Feb 12th 15:00 UTC Christopher Morrow (Feb 04)
- Re: Slack.com DNSSEC on Feb 12th 15:00 UTC Peter Beckman (Feb 04)
- Re: Slack.com DNSSEC on Feb 12th 15: 00 UTC John Levine (Feb 04)
- Simplified BGP peering solution Josh Saul (Feb 07)
- Re: Simplified BGP peering solution Laura Smith via NANOG (Feb 07)
- Re: Simplified BGP peering solution Mike Hammett (Feb 07)
- Re: Simplified BGP peering solution Jon Lewis (Feb 07)
- RE: Simplified BGP peering solution Adam Thompson (Feb 07)
- Re: Slack.com DNSSEC on Feb 12th 15:00 UTC Christopher Morrow (Feb 04)
- Re: Slack.com DNSSEC on Feb 12th 15:00 UTC Bjørn Mork (Feb 04)
- Re: Slack.com DNSSEC on Feb 12th 15:00 UTC Shumon Huque (Feb 04)