nanog mailing list archives

Re: Authoritative Resources for Public DNS Pinging

From: Lukas Tribus <lukas () ltri eu>
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2022 21:39:33 +0100

Hello,

On Tue, 8 Feb 2022 at 18:56, Mike Hammett <nanog () ics-il net> wrote:


Yes, pinging public DNS servers is bad.

Googling didn't help me find anything.

Are there any authoritative resources from said organizations saying you shouldn't use their servers for your 
persistent ping destinations?


This was just posted by Matthew Walster on the outages list (since
8.8.8.8 stopped responding to ICMP somewhere):

https://peering.google.com/#/learn-more/faq


Lukas

Current thread:

Authoritative Resources for Public DNS Pinging Mike Hammett (Feb 08)
- Re: Authoritative Resources for Public DNS Pinging Stephane Bortzmeyer (Feb 08)
  - Re: Authoritative Resources for Public DNS Pinging Mike Hammett (Feb 08)
- Re: Authoritative Resources for Public DNS Pinging Lukas Tribus (Feb 08)
  - Re: Authoritative Resources for Public DNS Pinging Lady Benjamin Cannon of Glencoe (Feb 08)
- Re: Authoritative Resources for Public DNS Pinging Tom Beecher (Feb 08)
  - Re: Authoritative Resources for Public DNS Pinging Mike Hammett (Feb 08)
    - Re: Authoritative Resources for Public DNS Pinging Christopher Morrow (Feb 08)
    - Re: Authoritative Resources for Public DNS Pinging Mike Hammett (Feb 08)
    - Re: Authoritative Resources for Public DNS Pinging Randy Bush (Feb 08)
    - Re: Authoritative Resources for Public DNS Pinging William Herrin (Feb 08)
    - Re: Authoritative Resources for Public DNS Pinging Grant Taylor via NANOG (Feb 08)
    - Re: Authoritative Resources for Public DNS Pinging Peter Beckman (Feb 08)
    - Re: Authoritative Resources for Public DNS Pinging Mark Delany (Feb 08)

(Thread continues...)