nanog mailing list archives
Re: 202212160543.AYC Re: eMail Conventions
From: ic <lists () benappy com>
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2022 18:04:23 +0100
Hi there,
On 16 Dec 2022, at 17:13, William Herrin <bill () herrin us> wrote: Most email clients assume that a change to the subject line (other than adding "Re:" to the front) indicates that the sender wants to discuss a new topic related to but meaningly different from the last.
Although I generally agree that changing the Subject line without reason is an annoyance, I didn’t notice any issue with it until I came across this thread, which wasn’t broken in my mail client (Apple’s Mail.app). This led me to a few tests, and FWIW even Mutt seems happy with the Subject changing and still threads the emails appropriately. In my experience, threading is done by clients looking for the In-Reply-To: header, not subject. Subject is a heuristic fallback, in case In-Reply-To is absent. Some email clients (although I don’t remember which ones) remove In-Reply-To: when the Subject: is changed (that might go as far back as my Gnus Oort days). BR, ic.
Current thread:
- 202212160543.AYC Re: eMail Conventions Abraham Y. Chen (Dec 16)
- Re: 202212160543.AYC Re: eMail Conventions Jethro Binks (Dec 16)
- Re: 202212160543.AYC Re: eMail Conventions Brielle (Dec 16)
- Re: 202212160543.AYC Re: eMail Conventions Pim van Stam (Dec 16)
- Re: 202212160543.AYC Re: eMail Conventions William Herrin (Dec 16)
- RE: 202212160543.AYC Re: eMail Conventions Kord Martin (Dec 16)
- Re: 202212160543.AYC Re: eMail Conventions ic (Dec 16)
- Re: 202212160543.AYC Re: eMail Conventions William Herrin (Dec 16)
- Re: 202212160543.AYC Re: eMail Conventions Joel Esler via NANOG (Dec 16)
- Re: 202212160543.AYC Re: eMail Conventions Brie (Dec 16)
- Re: 202212160543.AYC Re: eMail Conventions Tom Beecher (Dec 16)