nanog mailing list archives

Re: Large RTT or Why doesn't my ping traffic get discarded?


From: Mel Beckman <mel () beckman org>
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2022 17:28:29 +0000

Keep in mind that ping reports round trip time, so there could be a device delaying the ping reply on the return trip. 
In these cases, it helps to have a traceroute from both ends, to detect asymmetrical routing and possibly return path 
congestion invisible in a traceroute from you end.
________________________________
From: NANOG <nanog-bounces+mel=beckman.org () nanog org> on behalf of Mel Beckman <mel () beckman org>
Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2022 9:22 AM
To: Jason Iannone <jason.iannone () gmail com>; North American Network Operators' Group <nanog () nanog org>
Subject: Re: Large RTT or Why doesn't my ping traffic get discarded?

Sometimes this is usually due to high CPU time on the target device. If the device is under heavy load, the ICMP Echo 
process gets lowest priority. With a well-known name server like 4.2.2.2, this seems unlikely. It could be an 
intermediate hop or a routing loop, Do a traceroute to get more detailed per-hop statistics.

 -mel
________________________________
From: NANOG <nanog-bounces+mel=beckman.org () nanog org> on behalf of Jason Iannone <jason.iannone () gmail com>
Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2022 9:10 AM
To: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog () nanog org>
Subject: Large RTT or Why doesn't my ping traffic get discarded?

Here's a question I haven't bothered to ask until now. Can someone please help me understand why I receive a ping reply 
after almost 5 seconds? As I understand it, buffers in SP gear are generally 100ms. According to my math this round 
trip should have been discarded around the 1 second mark, even in a long path. Maybe I should buy a lottery ticket. I 
don't get it. What is happening here?

Jason

64 bytes from 4.2.2.2<http://4.2.2.2>: icmp_seq=392 ttl=54 time=4834.737 ms
64 bytes from 4.2.2.2<http://4.2.2.2>: icmp_seq=393 ttl=54 time=4301.243 ms
64 bytes from 4.2.2.2<http://4.2.2.2>: icmp_seq=394 ttl=54 time=3300.328 ms
64 bytes from 4.2.2.2<http://4.2.2.2>: icmp_seq=396 ttl=54 time=1289.723 ms
Request timeout for icmp_seq 400
Request timeout for icmp_seq 401
64 bytes from 4.2.2.2<http://4.2.2.2>: icmp_seq=398 ttl=54 time=4915.096 ms
64 bytes from 4.2.2.2<http://4.2.2.2>: icmp_seq=399 ttl=54 time=4310.575 ms
64 bytes from 4.2.2.2<http://4.2.2.2>: icmp_seq=400 ttl=54 time=4196.075 ms
64 bytes from 4.2.2.2<http://4.2.2.2>: icmp_seq=401 ttl=54 time=4287.048 ms
64 bytes from 4.2.2.2<http://4.2.2.2>: icmp_seq=403 ttl=54 time=2280.466 ms
64 bytes from 4.2.2.2<http://4.2.2.2>: icmp_seq=404 ttl=54 time=1279.348 ms
64 bytes from 4.2.2.2<http://4.2.2.2>: icmp_seq=405 ttl=54 time=276.669 ms

Current thread: