nanog mailing list archives
Re: Mitigating the effects of SLAAC renumbering events (draft-ietf-6man-slaac-renum)
From: Fernando Gont <fgont () si6networks com>
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2022 10:12:29 -0300
Hi, On 31/8/22 09:43, Vasilenko Eduard wrote:
Hi all, The router could split information between RAs (and send it at different intervals). It may be difficult to guess what is stale and what is just "not in this RA".
You ask the router, and the router responds.If you want to consider the case where the router intentionally splits the options into multiple packets (which does not exist in practice), AND the link is super lossy, you just increase the number of retransmissions.
There's no guessing. Thanks, -- Fernando Gont SI6 Networks e-mail: fgont () si6networks com PGP Fingerprint: F242 FF0E A804 AF81 EB10 2F07 7CA1 321D 663B B494
Current thread:
- Mitigating the effects of SLAAC renumbering events (draft-ietf-6man-slaac-renum) Fernando Gont (Aug 31)
- RE: Mitigating the effects of SLAAC renumbering events (draft-ietf-6man-slaac-renum) Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG (Aug 31)
- Re: Mitigating the effects of SLAAC renumbering events (draft-ietf-6man-slaac-renum) Fernando Gont (Aug 31)
- RE: Mitigating the effects of SLAAC renumbering events (draft-ietf-6man-slaac-renum) Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG (Aug 31)
- Re: Mitigating the effects of SLAAC renumbering events (draft-ietf-6man-slaac-renum) Fernando Gont (Aug 31)
- RE: Mitigating the effects of SLAAC renumbering events (draft-ietf-6man-slaac-renum) Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG (Aug 31)