nanog mailing list archives
Re: Allegedly Tier 1s in Wikipedia
From: Rubens Kuhl <rubensk () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2022 15:39:44 -0300
On Mon, Aug 1, 2022 at 3:19 PM Geoff Huston <gih () apnic net> wrote:
On 1 Aug 2022, at 11:10 am, Tom Paseka via NANOG <nanog () nanog org> wrote: Paying for "peering", doesn't stop you being a tier-1. Being a Tier-1 means you are "transit free" (technical term, not commercial). No one is transiting your routes to other Tier-1 providers.There are a lot of potential interpretations of “Tier 1” and often folk use the one that benefits their own classification (obviously!). The one I think corresponds to the conventional interpretation is "I’m a Tier 1 because I have a SKA peering agreement with other Tier 1 networks and I pay no other network for transit or peering”, or more informally, “I’m a Tier 1 because I pay nobody and everyone pays me, except for my peers.”
This conventional interpretation is the one I'm applying in this question.
I suspect that what goes on is “I’m a Tier 1 because I say so, and noone has contradicted me yet!" :-)
Which is unfortunately what some operators serving my region try applying. And after being contradicted, they move to "regional Tier-1" speech, which is something nobody ever defined. Rubens
Current thread:
- Allegedly Tier 1s in Wikipedia Rubens Kuhl (Aug 01)
- Re: Allegedly Tier 1s in Wikipedia Tom Paseka via NANOG (Aug 01)
- Re: Allegedly Tier 1s in Wikipedia Geoff Huston (Aug 01)
- Re: Allegedly Tier 1s in Wikipedia Rubens Kuhl (Aug 01)
- Re: Allegedly Tier 1s in Wikipedia Tom Beecher (Aug 02)
- Re: Allegedly Tier 1s in Wikipedia Mike Hammett (Aug 02)
- Re: Allegedly Tier 1s in Wikipedia Jared Mauch (Aug 02)
- Re: Allegedly Tier 1s in Wikipedia Mike Hammett (Aug 02)
- Re: Allegedly Tier 1s in Wikipedia Geoff Huston (Aug 01)
- Re: Allegedly Tier 1s in Wikipedia Tom Paseka via NANOG (Aug 01)