nanog mailing list archives
Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Yet another BGP hijacking towards AS16509
From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" <rfg () tristatelogic com>
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2022 19:03:19 -0700
In message <CAO3CAMoT9gC_Evd-CcZg06A-o_MajmLtxLHbXFnauDoMyqoSYg () mail gmail com>, Siyuan Miao <siyuan () misaka io> wrote:
Hjacking didn't last too long. AWS started announcing a more specific announcement to prevent hijacking around 3 hours later. Kudos to Amazon's security team :-)
Sorry. I'm missing something here. If the hijack was of 44.235.216.0/24, then how did AWS propagate a "more specific" than that? Regards, rfg
Current thread:
- Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Yet another BGP hijacking towards AS16509 Ronald F. Guilmette (Aug 22)
- Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Yet another BGP hijacking towards AS16509 Siyuan Miao (Aug 22)
- Amprnet? (was Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Yet another BGP hijacking towards AS16509) Ellenor Agnes Bjornsdottir (Aug 29)
- Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Yet another BGP hijacking towards AS16509 Siyuan Miao (Aug 22)