nanog mailing list archives
Re: NANOG List posts and DMARC
From: John Levine via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>
Date: 2 Aug 2022 16:31:46 -0400
It appears that Michael Thomas via NANOG <mike () mtcc com> said:
On 8/2/22 12:30 PM, Jim Popovitch via NANOG wrote:It's been doing it for ages for p=reject, but not p=none (the latter being Jared's situation)
I don't understand Jared's concern. His DMARC policy, like mine, is p=none which tells receivers to do nothing DMARC-y with our messages. I don't get any sort of blowback from nanog posts that I can recall seeing.
I'm sort of surprised that an org would have p=reject when its users use outside mailing lists.
Unfortunately, we lost that battle a long time ago. It's "more secure" and "best practice" so go away. R's, John
Current thread:
- NANOG List posts and DMARC Jared Mauch (Aug 02)
- Re: NANOG List posts and DMARC Chris Adams via NANOG (Aug 02)
- Re: NANOG List posts and DMARC Chris Adams via NANOG (Aug 02)
- Re: NANOG List posts and DMARC Michael Thomas via NANOG (Aug 02)
- Re: NANOG List posts and DMARC Jim Popovitch via NANOG (Aug 02)
- Re: NANOG List posts and DMARC Michael Thomas via NANOG (Aug 02)
- Re: NANOG List posts and DMARC John Levine via NANOG (Aug 02)
- Re: NANOG List posts and DMARC Jared Mauch via NANOG (Aug 02)
- Re: NANOG List posts but not DMARC John R. Levine via NANOG (Aug 02)
- Re: NANOG List posts and DMARC Chris Adams via NANOG (Aug 02)
- Re: NANOG List posts and DMARC Chris Adams via NANOG (Aug 02)
- Re: NANOG List posts and DMARC Chris Adams via NANOG (Aug 02)
- Re: NANOG List posts and DMARC Bryan Fields via NANOG (Aug 02)