nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 woes - RFC
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta () necom830 hpcl titech ac jp>
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2021 19:05:46 +0900
Saku Ytti wrote:
It is almost guaranteed we are married to IPv4 past our life cycles, because there will be a lot of drivers to keep it.
So, the war was between "IPv4 with NAT" and "IPv4 dual stacked with IPv6". If IPv6 were simple, quickly standardized and easily deployable, which are technical points, it could have won. Masataka Ohta
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Victor Kuarsingh (Sep 18)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC John R. Levine (Sep 18)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Jared Mauch (Sep 18)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Owen DeLong via NANOG (Sep 18)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Owen DeLong via NANOG (Sep 18)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Victor Kuarsingh (Sep 19)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Owen DeLong via NANOG (Sep 20)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Owen DeLong via NANOG (Sep 18)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Masataka Ohta (Sep 18)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Saku Ytti (Sep 19)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Masataka Ohta (Sep 19)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Stephen Satchell (Sep 19)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Owen DeLong via NANOG (Sep 19)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Masataka Ohta (Sep 20)
- RE: IPv6 woes - RFC Brian Turnbow via NANOG (Sep 20)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Owen DeLong via NANOG (Sep 20)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Owen DeLong via NANOG (Sep 20)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Masataka Ohta (Sep 22)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Baldur Norddahl (Sep 22)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Colton Conor (Sep 22)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Mark Andrews (Sep 22)