nanog mailing list archives

Re: IPv6 woes - RFC


From: Eliot Lear <lear () ofcourseimright com>
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2021 14:37:47 +0200

8+8 came *MUCH* later than that, and really wasn't ready for prime time.  The reason we know that is that work was the basis of LISP and ILNP.  Yes, standing on the shoulders of giants.  And there certainly were poor design decisions in IPv6, bundling IPsec being one.  But the idea that operators were ignored?  Feh.

On 14.09.21 14:10, Randy Bush wrote:
and 8+8, variable length, ... just didn't happen, eh?

the nice thing about revisionist history is that anybody can play.

randy

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Current thread: