nanog mailing list archives

Re: IPv6 woes - RFC


From: Masataka Ohta <mohta () necom830 hpcl titech ac jp>
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2021 09:08:44 +0900

Owen DeLong via NANOG wrote:

The reality is that if we get content dual-stacked and stop requiring IPv4
for new eyeball installations, that’s the biggest initial win.

This is my point… That is why I think an announcement of “On X date,
we will begin charging extra for IPv4 services and define Internet Access
to be IPv6” by a couple of the larger eyeball ISPs would light a pretty
big fire under those laggards.

Aren't you calling your desire "the reality"?

                                                        Masataka Ohta


Current thread: