nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 woes - RFC
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta () necom830 hpcl titech ac jp>
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2021 09:08:44 +0900
Owen DeLong via NANOG wrote:
The reality is that if we get content dual-stacked and stop requiring IPv4 for new eyeball installations, that’s the biggest initial win.
This is my point… That is why I think an announcement of “On X date, we will begin charging extra for IPv4 services and define Internet Access to be IPv6” by a couple of the larger eyeball ISPs would light a pretty big fire under those laggards.
Aren't you calling your desire "the reality"? Masataka Ohta
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Mark Tinka (Sep 08)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Etienne-Victor Depasquale via NANOG (Sep 08)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Mark Tinka (Sep 08)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Etienne-Victor Depasquale via NANOG (Sep 08)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Mark Tinka (Sep 08)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Brandon Butterworth (Sep 08)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Mark Tinka (Sep 08)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Owen DeLong via NANOG (Sep 08)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Valdis Klētnieks (Sep 08)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Owen DeLong via NANOG (Sep 09)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Masataka Ohta (Sep 09)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Bjørn Mork (Sep 09)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Jeroen Massar via NANOG (Sep 10)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Owen DeLong via NANOG (Sep 10)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Jeroen Massar via NANOG (Sep 10)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Owen DeLong via NANOG (Sep 11)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC John Levine (Sep 10)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Owen DeLong via NANOG (Sep 11)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC John R. Levine (Sep 11)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Owen DeLong via NANOG (Sep 17)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC John R. Levine (Sep 17)