nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 woes - RFC
From: Saku Ytti <saku () ytti fi>
Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2021 10:30:28 +0300
On Wed, 8 Sept 2021 at 10:25, Mark Tinka <mark@tinka.africa> wrote:
Do we drive this through the IETF, or just have private, multi-lateral agreements, as major operators?
I have no idea, I'll ask our VP if we'd entertain such a contract and if so what type of terms. I imagine some website documenting who has undersigned. I also anticipate we'd need an escape clause, like a company could go 'our commitment will expire if these of our competitors do not commit'. So we'd have a list of companies customers can pressure to commit in order to put the contracts in-force. This may be a naive suggestion, this is not an area I have experience in. But I'll ask nonetheless. -- ++ytti
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG (Sep 06)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Bjørn Mork (Sep 06)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Niels Bakker (Sep 06)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG (Sep 06)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Bjørn Mork (Sep 06)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG (Sep 06)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Baldur Norddahl (Sep 06)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Owen DeLong via NANOG (Sep 07)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Saku Ytti (Sep 07)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Mark Tinka (Sep 08)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Saku Ytti (Sep 08)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Mark Tinka (Sep 08)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Etienne-Victor Depasquale via NANOG (Sep 08)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Mark Tinka (Sep 08)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Etienne-Victor Depasquale via NANOG (Sep 08)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Mark Tinka (Sep 08)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Brandon Butterworth (Sep 08)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Mark Tinka (Sep 08)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Owen DeLong via NANOG (Sep 08)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Valdis Klētnieks (Sep 08)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Owen DeLong via NANOG (Sep 09)