nanog mailing list archives

Re: PCH Peering Survey 2021

From: Denis Fondras <xxnog () ledeuns net>
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2021 18:55:23 +0200

Le Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 01:47:37PM +0200, Bill Woodcock a écrit :

If you’re peering with an MLPA route-server, you’re welcome to include just
the route-server’s ASN, if that’s easiest, rather than trying to include each
of the peer ASNs on the other side of the route-server. Either way is fine.


I have an agreement with the RS owner (IXP) but not with each participant.
Should the contractual relationship be true or false ?

Current thread:

PCH Peering Survey 2021 Bill Woodcock (Oct 29)
- Re: PCH Peering Survey 2021 Denis Fondras (Oct 29)
  - Re: PCH Peering Survey 2021 Bill Woodcock (Oct 29)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: PCH Peering Survey 2021 Adam Thompson (Oct 31)