Re: possible rsync validation dos vuln

[Barry Greene <bgreene () senki org>]

> On Oct 29, 2021, at 5:26 PM, Nick Hilliard <nick () foobar org> wrote:
>
> Because this didn't happen, we now get to look forward to a weekend of elevated risk, followed by people upending 
> their calendars to handle un-coordinated upgrades on monday morning.


That only happens if the team has the time to get the fix into the code, tested, validated, regressed, and deployed. I 
would say this is a classic example of “ego” to publish overruling established principles.

The University of Twente should explore requiring classes for responsible disclosure.

NCSC, it seems you threw out your own policy:

"The NCSC will try to resolve the security problem that you have reported in a system within 60 days. Once the problem 
has been resolved, we will decide in consultation whether and how details will be published.”

I would have expected you to council the researchers on responsible disclosure principles.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP