nanog mailing list archives
DC Power choices (was Re: Network visibility)
From: "Jay R. Ashworth" <jra () baylink com>
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2021 05:13:00 +0000 (UTC)
One of the 4 or 5 datacenters in downtown Tampa had a telco or offshoot in their spaces, when I took All The Tours about 9 years ago. They have 8x750MCM hauling -48VDC from their power plant to the cage in question. On each side. It was, in fact, pretty impressive to look at. But I was a little worried about the loading on the building frame. :-) And while I think there might be advantages in running power supplies in gear at -48, I'd want to rectify it in the cage, preferably from 480/3ph. Cheers, -- jra ----- Original Message -----
From: "Lady Benjamin Cannon of Glencoe, ASCE" <lb () 6by7 net> To: "Mark Tinka" <mark@tinka.africa> Cc: "NANOG Operators' Group" <nanog () nanog org> Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2021 4:50:10 PM Subject: Re: Network visibility
Outside the datacenter is where DC power really shines in my opinion. Inside the DC, everything is AC now and probably for the best. We never came up with a modular standard for -48VDC. Perhaps that could have changed things. But it sure is nice having 72hrs of battery run time in the field/edge - although those are becoming mini data centers themselves and are in turn also slowly going AC. Ms. Lady Benjamin PD Cannon of Glencoe, ASCE 6x7 Networks & 6x7 Telecom, LLC CEO lb () 6by7 net "The only fully end-to-end encrypted global telecommunications company in the world.” FCC License KJ6FJJ Sent from my iPhone via RFC1149.On Oct 20, 2021, at 10:19 PM, Mark Tinka <mark@tinka.africa> wrote: On 10/20/21 20:37, Lady Benjamin Cannon of Glencoe, ASCE wrote: -48VDC power is still the best.I really envy folk that love DC for networking gear :-). Work in 2007 was an all-DC network. I rebuilt it into AC, considering the ISP also owned the data centre (most of whose customers bought AC). The space we freed up and the ease of deployment was night & day. Currently, we obviously need DC for the terrestrial Transport and wet plants (because that's just how classic telco rolls), but I also switched all IP/MPLS gear to AC soon as I arrived. Heck, even the Arbor (now Netscout) gear, as well as the HP server rack, was loaded with DC power supplies. Those things just had to go. There is an avenue of pleasure in not having to spend inordinate amounts of time adding major electrical planning to deploying/decommissioning a router, switch or server. But yeah, I know the AC vs. DC discussion can become a rat hole. I'm aware of data centre operators now providing DC as an option for their expansion projects, when they previously had it as the norm, FWIW. Mark.
-- Jay R. Ashworth Baylink jra () baylink com Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100 Ashworth & Associates http://www.bcp38.info 2000 Land Rover DII St Petersburg FL USA BCP38: Ask For It By Name! +1 727 647 1274
Current thread:
- Re: Network visibility, (continued)
- Re: Network visibility Owen DeLong via NANOG (Oct 21)
- Re: Network visibility Lady Benjamin Cannon of Glencoe, ASCE (Oct 20)
- Re: Network visibility Brian Johnson (Oct 20)
- Re: Network visibility Mark Tinka (Oct 20)
- Re: Network visibility Brian Johnson (Oct 21)
- Re: Network visibility Mark Tinka (Oct 21)
- Re: Network visibility Mark Tinka (Oct 20)
- Re: Network visibility Lady Benjamin Cannon of Glencoe, ASCE (Oct 21)
- Re: Network visibility Owen DeLong via NANOG (Oct 21)
- Re: Network visibility Mark Tinka (Oct 21)
- DC Power choices (was Re: Network visibility) Jay R. Ashworth (Oct 21)
- Re: DC Power choices (was Re: Network visibility) Bryan Fields (Oct 23)