nanog mailing list archives

RE: slack.com

From: Jean St-Laurent via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>
Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2021 07:18:18 -0400

Friday is always a good day to do such change. :D

-----Original Message-----
From: NANOG <nanog-bounces+jean=ddostest.me () nanog org> On Behalf Of Mark Tinka
Sent: October 2, 2021 2:17 AM
To: Bill Woodcock <woody () pch net>
Cc: nanog () nanog org
Subject: Re: slack.com



On 10/2/21 08:14, Bill Woodcock wrote:

We did not use an NTA, but we did flush our cache immediately once 
Slack had fixed their problem.  I think that’s the right balance of 
carrot and stick.


Tend to agree with this approach.

But I can see how an issue like this could be potentially religious. 
DNSSEC deployment rate is bad enough, as it is.

Mark.

Current thread:

slack.com Mark Tinka (Oct 01)
- Re: slack.com Bill Woodcock (Oct 01)
  - Re: slack.com Mark Tinka (Oct 01)
    - RE: slack.com Jean St-Laurent via NANOG (Oct 02)