nanog mailing list archives
Re: FYI: NANOG and ICANN
From: Warren Kumari <warren () kumari net>
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2021 15:39:46 -0400
On Fri, Oct 8, 2021 at 2:39 PM Owen DeLong via NANOG <nanog () nanog org> wrote:
I see this as a way to allow NANOG to help channel some of ICANN’s incredible excess of funding towards more useful pursuits than those ICANN has endowed so far.
https://www.icann.org/en/announcements/details/icann-and-first-sign-memorandum-of-understanding-on-dns-threats-mitigation-22-5-2020-en https://www.icann.org/en/announcements/details/icann-signs-memorandum-of-understanding-with-the-georgian-national-communications-commission-7-12-2020-en https://www.icann.org/en/announcements/details/gsma-and-icann-sign-memorandum-of-understanding-at-gsma-mobile-world-congress-28-2-2018-en https://www.icann.org/en/announcements/details/icann-signs-memorandum-of-understanding-with-the-global-cyber-alliance-16-6-2020-en I suspect that if you think that this will make it rain, you will be sadly disappointed... W
Owen On Oct 4, 2021, at 9:27 AM, Edward McNair <emcnair () nanog org> wrote: This partnership will have no ill effect on NANOG conferences. The focus of these partnerships are on outreach, technical education and underserved communities in North America. *Edward McNair* Executive Director emcnair () nanog org | +1 866-902-1336 ext. 102 | www.nanog.org NANOG | 305 E. Eisenhower Pkwy, Suite 100 | Ann Arbor, MI 48108, USA On Oct 4, 2021, at 9:12 AM, Mehmet Akcin <mehmet () akcin net> wrote: Icann meetings used to be great. They are horrible now with few exceptions of several technical sessions. I hope this don’t ruin nanog meetings On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 12:08 J. Hellenthal via NANOG <nanog () nanog org> wrote:You mean they could not come together enough to share even the same page yet even a domain name or central corporation to oversee these needs ? Personally I'm calling partially "bullshit" the Matthew McConaughey way! -- J. Hellenthal The fact that there's a highway to Hell but only a stairway to Heaven says a lot about anticipated traffic volume.On Oct 4, 2021, at 09:33, Patrick W. Gilmore <patrick () ianai net> wrote: NANOG’s version:https://www.nanog.org/stories/nanog-signs-a-memorandum-of-understanding-with-internet-society-icann/-- TTFN, patrickOn Oct 4, 2021, at 4:42 AM, Hank Nussbacher <hank () interall co il>wrote:https://www.icann.org/en/announcements/details/icann-signs-a-memorandum-of-understanding-with-nanog-27-9-2021-enRegards, Hank-- Mehmet +1-424-298-1903
-- The computing scientist’s main challenge is not to get confused by the complexities of his own making. -- E. W. Dijkstra
Current thread:
- FYI: NANOG and ICANN Hank Nussbacher (Oct 04)
- Re: FYI: NANOG and ICANN Patrick W. Gilmore (Oct 04)
- Re: FYI: NANOG and ICANN J. Hellenthal via NANOG (Oct 04)
- Re: FYI: NANOG and ICANN Mehmet Akcin (Oct 04)
- Re: FYI: NANOG and ICANN Edward McNair (Oct 04)
- Re: FYI: NANOG and ICANN Owen DeLong via NANOG (Oct 08)
- Re: FYI: NANOG and ICANN Warren Kumari (Oct 08)
- Re: FYI: NANOG and ICANN Owen DeLong via NANOG (Oct 08)
- Re: FYI: NANOG and ICANN Martin Hannigan (Oct 09)
- Re: FYI: NANOG and ICANN J. Hellenthal via NANOG (Oct 04)
- Re: FYI: NANOG and ICANN Patrick W. Gilmore (Oct 04)