nanog mailing list archives
ROVv6 does not behave the same way as ROVv4: What rookie mistake(s) did I make?
From: Pirawat WATANAPONGSE via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2021 21:18:06 +0700
Dear all, We just turned on our RPKI Route Origin Validation yesterday, then something weird happened: [Reference: We are running NLnet Labs’ Routinator 3000, feeding a Cisco ASR 1000 Series router. I know, I know, we haven’t started a second validator yet.] When we tested against the two testers: https://sg-pub.ripe.net/jasper/rpki-web-test/ and https://isbgpsafeyet.com/ the IPv4-only net-segment passed with flying color. [by the way, very sneaky you Cloudflare, registering the invalid block to the AS0 is a nice touch; I had to configure the router to really drop the invalid routes instead of just lowering their preference. Good show, mate!] However, when we tested on dual-stack net-segment, the first test passed, but Cloudflare invalids sneak through on the IPv6 side, causing the second test to fail. So, here comes the question: What rookie mistake(s) did I make? IPv4 and IPv6 configuration are supposed to be symmetry, right? Or did I miss something? And since I already start asking: For a “second validator”, which choice is better: second copy of the same software, or different software altogether? Thanks in advance for all comments and advices, -- Pirawat.
Current thread:
- ROVv6 does not behave the same way as ROVv4: What rookie mistake(s) did I make? Pirawat WATANAPONGSE via NANOG (Mar 02)
- Re: ROVv6 does not behave the same way as ROVv4: What rookie mistake(s) did I make? Douglas Fischer (Mar 02)
- Re: ROVv6 does not behave the same way as ROVv4: What rookie mistake(s) did I make? Lukas Tribus (Mar 03)
- Re: ROVv6 does not behave the same way as ROVv4: What rookie mistake(s) did I make? heasley (Mar 04)