Re: OT: Re: Younger generations preferring social media(esque) interactions.

[Michael Thomas <mike () mtcc com>]

On 3/24/21 5:57 PM, Bryan Fields wrote:
> On 3/24/21 8:44 PM, Michael Thomas wrote:
> > FWIW, nanog doesn't alter
> > messages. All lists have the option to follow suit.
> It does.  There's a setting in mailman that's enabled for the nanog list.
>
> dmarc_moderation_action (privacy): Action to take when anyone posts to the
> list from a domain with a DMARC Reject/Quarantine Policy.
>
> It's set to Munge From.
>
> So if your domain had a reject policy on DMARC, nanog will munge the from:
> header to be 'Your Name via NANOG'<nanog () nanog org>.
Yes, the IETF list does that, for example. But NANOG's just not 
modifying anything is better, IMO.

But the larger point is that people should set p=reject and put the 
burden on mailing lists to adapt.

Mike