nanog mailing list archives

RE: CGNAT


From: <aaron1 () gvtc com>
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2021 22:39:25 -0600

We thought about it for a while at the ISP where I work, and went with Juniper MX960's w/MS-MPC-128G.  Been working 
quite nice for us.

Initially, we went with smaller MX104 w/MS-MIC-16G to prove it out on our ~4,000 lower bandwidth DSL customers... when 
convinced, we then went all in with multiple MX960's w/MS-MPC-128G....now over 50,000 customers of dsl, cable modem and 
ftth

...all that behind about ~/21

I'll add that we already had the 960's for the 100gig mpls sp core we had built, so it was an investment only on the 
service module to do cgnat.


-Aaron



Current thread: