nanog mailing list archives
Re: Layer 2 based anycast - Kind like GLBP - Research
From: Baldur Norddahl <baldur.norddahl () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2021 20:29:47 +0200
On Thu, Jul 1, 2021 at 8:04 PM Douglas Fischer <fischerdouglas () gmail com> wrote:
I friend Suggested that EVPN could help-me, but I must confess that is a hard topic to me. Unless it can be used depending exclusively on software (no special hardware required), it won't fit.
Linux has EVPN support. Or you could use network switches with EVPN support. EVPN will let each server or direct connected switch be a hidden layer 3 gateway. The application will not know about it and it will appear to be layer 2 but routable like layer 3. Which means you can do anycast at layer 3. Physically the packets are moved in tunnels so you can use any layer 2 or layer 3 hardware at your choice. Regards, Baldur
Current thread:
- Layer 2 based anycast - Kind like GLBP - Research Douglas Fischer (Jul 01)
- Re: Layer 2 based anycast - Kind like GLBP - Research colin johnston (Jul 01)
- Re: Layer 2 based anycast - Kind like GLBP - Research Baldur Norddahl (Jul 01)
- Re: Layer 2 based anycast - Kind like GLBP - Research William Herrin (Jul 01)
- Re: Layer 2 based anycast - Kind like GLBP - Research Baldur Norddahl (Jul 01)
- Re: Layer 2 based anycast - Kind like GLBP - Research Douglas Fischer (Jul 02)
- Re: Layer 2 based anycast - Kind like GLBP - Research Masataka Ohta (Jul 01)
- Re: Layer 2 based anycast - Kind like GLBP - Research Douglas Fischer (Jul 02)
- RE: Layer 2 based anycast - Kind like GLBP - Research Jean St-Laurent via NANOG (Jul 02)
- Re: Layer 2 based anycast - Kind like GLBP - Research Masataka Ohta (Jul 02)
- Re: Layer 2 based anycast - Kind like GLBP - Research Douglas Fischer (Jul 02)
- Re: Layer 2 based anycast - Kind like GLBP - Research Dobbins, Roland (Jul 02)