Re: A crazy idea

[Bryan Fields <Bryan () bryanfields net>]

On 7/19/21 8:09 AM, Stephen Satchell wrote:
> First, I know this isn't the right place to propose this; need a pointer 
> to where to propose an outlandish idea.

> What would the domain names look like?  Let's take my current IP/IPv6 
> assignments from AT&T:
>
>    2600:1700:79b0:ddc0::/64
>    99.65.194.96/29
>
> The IPv6 delegation would be easy:
>
> > 0.c.d.d.0.b.9.7.0.0.7.1.0.0.6.2.ip6.arpa. NS my-DNS-server-1.
> > 0.c.d.d.0.b.9.7.0.0.7.1.0.0.6.2.ip6.arpa. NS my-DNS-server-2.

Yup, simple, I do this for my customers (and DS records).

However that reverse zone has DNSSEC on it.  You'd need a DS record to tie
my-DNS-server-1. to the ATT DNS server and your server would need to support
DNSSEC.  ATT may want to enforce DNSSEC on that zone, but not want to sign
stuff they can't control.

Just playing devils advocate.

-- 
Bryan Fields

727-409-1194 - Voice
http://bryanfields.net