Re: Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez' Office is on NANOG?? Or, what is the policy about sharing email offlist?

[Javier J <javier () advancedmachines us>]

Sounds like someone has more time to talk/type about political dogma with
random strangers than the purpose of this mailing list.

- J

On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 6:58 AM J. Hellenthal <jhellenthal () dataix net>
wrote:

> Yeah he did the same dolt act to me to. Just a really bored dolt looking
> for nonsense with a crush on AOC.
>
> --
>  J. Hellenthal
>
> The fact that there's a highway to Hell but only a stairway to Heaven says
> a lot about anticipated traffic volume.
>
> On Jan 19, 2021, at 00:40, Javier J <javier () advancedmachines us> wrote:
>
> 
> you too, why are you emailing me?
>
> I didn't ask anyone to contact me off list.
>
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 8:53 PM Sam Silvester <sam.silvester () gmail com>
> wrote:
>
> > Archives are browsable by anybody. How do you expect to keep political
> > types out of the discussion?
> >
> > On Tue, 19 Jan 2021 at 11:36 am, Javier J <javier () advancedmachines us>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I couldn't agree more.
> > > If I want to talk politics, I will go to other places. I use this
> > > mailing list to talk about things relevant to technology and operation of
> > > networks in North American and other places.
> > >
> > > - Javier
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 4:19 PM Mel Beckman <mel () beckman org> wrote:
> > >
> > > > javier,
> > > >
> > > > I concur. What we don’t need on Nanog is outside parties deciding to
> > > > “reign in” our discussions on political grounds!
> > > >
> > > >  -mel beckman
> > > >
> > > > On Jan 18, 2021, at 12:38 PM, Javier J <javier () advancedmachines us>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > 
> > > > I agree 100%.
> > > >
> > > > I know the emails on this list are public and that is fine.  What I
> > > > don't appreciate is that now my email address is in some politico's address
> > > > list because of someone's behavior.
> > > >
> > > > - Javier
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 3:20 PM Jon Lewis <jlewis () lewis org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > There's a world of difference between "don't expect list posts to be
> > > > > private to list members" and "don't forward the list to
> > > > > autoresponders."
> > > > > The stupidity of the latter, if it can be tracked down to who did it,
> > > > > should result in their removal from the list, at least until they
> > > > > explain
> > > > > what caused them to do that and have undone it.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, 18 Jan 2021, Paul Timmins wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > The list has public archives. Draw your own conclusions on the
> > > > > policy.
> > > > > > https://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 1/18/21 2:40 PM, Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. wrote:
> > > > > > >  Not under that impression at all. That's very different from "what
> > > > > is the
> > > > > > >  policy" - at least in the groups I run, if the policy is "no
> > > > > sharing
> > > > > > >  offlist" and then someone does, there are consequences for that
> > > > > someone.
> > > > > > >  Anne
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >  --
> > > > > > >  Anne P. Mitchell,  Attorney at Law
> > > > > > >  Dean of Cyberlaw & Cybersecurity, Lincoln Law School
> > > > > > >  Author: Section 6 of the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 (the Federal
> > > > > anti-spam law)
> > > > > > >  Board of Directors, Denver Internet Exchange
> > > > > > >  Chair Emeritus, Asilomar Microcomputer Workshop
> > > > > > >  Former Counsel: Mail Abuse Prevention System (MAPS)
> > > > >
> > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > >   Jon Lewis, MCP :)           |  I route
> > > > >   StackPath, Sr. Neteng       |  therefore you are
> > > > > _________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________