nanog mailing list archives
Re: Parler
From: William Herrin <bill () herrin us>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 21:07:50 -0800
On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 8:46 PM Matthew Petach <mpetach () netflight com> wrote:
...unless the higher calling of "religious freedom" is at stake, in which case, sure, it's OK to exclude entire classes of people, if serving them would go against your religious beliefs. precedent set by Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission, 584 U.S. ___ (2018)
Hi Matt, As I recall, the finding in Masterpiece Cakeshop was that the commission screwed up the execution of their process so badly that the result was void. Although both sides badly wanted the court to set a precedent around excluding customers on a religious basis, it did not do so. Regards, Bill Herrin -- Hire me! https://bill.herrin.us/resume/
Current thread:
- Re: Parler, (continued)
- Re: Parler William Herrin (Jan 10)
- Re: more bad lawyering about Parler John Levine (Jan 10)
- Re: more bad lawyering about Parler William Herrin (Jan 10)
- Message not available
- Re: more bad lawyering about Parler William Herrin (Jan 11)
- Re: more bad lawyering about Parler Joe Greco (Jan 11)
- Re: more bad lawyering about Parler William Herrin (Jan 11)
- Re: more bad lawyering about Parler John Levine (Jan 11)
- Re: more bad lawyering about Parler John Levine (Jan 11)
- Re: Parler bzs (Jan 10)
- Re: Parler Matthew Petach (Jan 11)
- Re: Parler William Herrin (Jan 11)
- Re: Parler Aaron C. de Bruyn via NANOG (Jan 10)
- Re: not a utility, was Parler John Levine (Jan 10)
- Re: not a utility, was Parler Rod Beck (Jan 11)
- Re: not a utility, was Parler Karl Auer (Jan 11)
- Re: not a utility, was Parler Sabri Berisha (Jan 11)
- Re: the tiny domain business, not a utility, was Parler John Levine (Jan 11)
- Re: the tiny domain business, not a utility, was Parler Randy Bush (Jan 11)
- Re: not a utility, was Parler Matthew Petach (Jan 11)
- Re: Parler and the total legality of content moderation John Levine (Jan 10)