nanog mailing list archives
Re: Parler
From: Rod Beck <rod.beck () unitedcablecompany com>
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2021 21:58:33 +0000
The Courts have never interpreted the free speech rights to be totally without limits. I am pretty sure sedition defined as a concrete threat to take back the country by blocking the vote certification of the incoming President is not protected speech. Just because one does not moderate all content does not mean one cannot moderate some content. Mostly hands off does not imply totally hands off. ________________________________ From: NANOG <nanog-bounces+rod.beck=unitedcablecompany.com () nanog org> on behalf of Matt Hoppes <mattlists () rivervalleyinternet net> Sent: Sunday, January 10, 2021 4:10 PM To: sronan () ronan-online com <sronan () ronan-online com> Cc: nanog () nanog org <nanog () nanog org> Subject: Re: Parler Is that illegal though?
On Jan 10, 2021, at 10:07 AM, sronan () ronan-online com wrote: Another interesting angle here is that it as ruled President couldn’t block people, because his Tweets were government communication. So has Twitter now blocked government communication?On Jan 10, 2021, at 9:51 AM, Michael Thomas <mike () mtcc com> wrote: On 1/10/21 5:42 AM, sronan () ronan-online com wrote:While Amazon is absolutely within their rights to suspend anyone they want for violation of their TOS, it does create an interesting problem. Amazon is now in the content moderation business, which could potentially open them up to liability if they fail to suspend any other customer who hosts objectionable content. When I actively hosted USENET servers, I was repeatedly warned by in-house and external counsel, not to moderate which groups I hosted based on content, less I become responsible for moderating all groups, shouldn’t that same principal apply to platforms like AWS and Twitter?Is it content moderation, or just giving the boot to enabling criminal activity? Would that more providers be given the boot for enabling voice spam scams, for example. Didn't one of the $n-chan's get the boot a while back? I don't seem to recall a lot of push back about that and it was pretty much the same situation, iirc. Mike
Current thread:
- Re: Parler, (continued)
- Re: Parler sronan (Jan 10)
- Re: Parler Matt Hoppes (Jan 10)
- Re: Parler sronan (Jan 10)
- Re: Parler John Sage (Jan 10)
- Re: Parler sronan (Jan 10)
- Re: Parler Mark Seiden (Jan 10)
- Re: Parler Bill Woodcock (Jan 10)
- Re: Parler Izaac (Jan 10)
- Re: Parler Valdis Klētnieks (Jan 10)
- Re: Parler cosmo (Jan 10)
- Re: Parler Rod Beck (Jan 10)
- Re: Parler Joe Greco (Jan 10)
- Re: Parler Matt Hoppes (Jan 10)
- Re: Parler Haudy Kazemi via NANOG (Jan 10)
- Re: Parler mark seery (Jan 10)
- Re: Parler Ben Cannon (Jan 10)
- Re: Parler Bill Woodcock (Jan 10)
- Re: Parler Matthew Petach (Jan 10)
- Re: Parler William Herrin (Jan 10)
- Re: Parler Bryan Fields (Jan 10)
- Re: Parler Michael Thomas (Jan 10)