nanog mailing list archives
Re: Parler
From: sronan () ronan-online com
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2021 09:26:21 -0500
NANOG is a group of Operators, discussion does not have to be about networking. I have already explained how this represents a significant issue for Network Operators.
On Jan 10, 2021, at 9:09 AM, Mike Bolitho <mikebolitho () gmail com> wrote: It has nothing to do with networking. Their decision was necessarily political. If you can specifically bring up an issue, beyond speculative, on how their new chosen CDN is somehow now causing congestion or routing issues on the public internet, then great. But as of now, that isn't even a thing. It's just best to leave it alone because it will devolve into chaos. - Mike BolithoOn Sun, Jan 10, 2021, 6:54 AM <sronan () ronan-online com> wrote: Why? This is extremely relevant to network operators and is not political at all.On Jan 10, 2021, at 8:51 AM, Mike Bolitho <mikebolitho () gmail com> wrote: Can we please not go down this rabbit hole on here? List admins? - Mike BolithoOn Sun, Jan 10, 2021, 1:26 AM William Herrin <bill () herrin us> wrote: Anybody looking for a new customer opportunity? It seems Parler is in search of a new service provider. Vendors need only provide all the proprietary AWS APIs that Parler depends upon to function. https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2021/01/09/amazon-parler-suspension/ Regards, Bill HErrin
Current thread:
- Re: Parler, (continued)
- Re: Parler Jay R. Ashworth (Jan 13)
- Re: Parler John Levine (Jan 10)
- Re: Parler Randy Bush (Jan 10)
- Re: Parler Bryan Fields (Jan 11)
- Re: Parler Michael Thomas (Jan 11)
- Re: Parler Jason Kuehl (Jan 11)
- Re: Parler bzs (Jan 10)
- Re: Parler sronan (Jan 10)
- Re: Parler Mike Bolitho (Jan 10)
- Re: Parler sronan (Jan 10)
- Re: Parler K. Scott Helms (Jan 10)
- Re: Parler Mark Tinka (Jan 10)
- Re: Parler Töma Gavrichenkov (Jan 10)
- Re: Parler sronan (Jan 10)
- Re: Parler Michael Thomas (Jan 10)
- Re: Parler Töma Gavrichenkov (Jan 10)
- Re: Parler Michael Thomas (Jan 10)