nanog mailing list archives

Re: DoD IP Space


From: Ca By <cb.list6 () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 06:29:03 -0800

On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 6:11 AM Bjørn Mork <bjorn () mork no> wrote:

Ca By <cb.list6 () gmail com> writes:

The 3 cellular networks in the usa, 100m subs each, use ipv6 to uniquely
address customers. And in the case of ims (telephony on a celluar), it is
ipv6-only, afaik.

I certainly agree that this is easier and makes more sense.  I just
don't buy the "can't be done" wrt using rfc1918.


Well, it is not rfc1918 that is best invoked here.

May i point you to rfc1925 section 2.3, regarding pigs flying with
sufficient thrust. IPv4 is the pig, and a steam engined fueled by dollars
is the source of thrust

https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1925



Bjørn


Current thread: