nanog mailing list archives
Re: DoD IP Space
From: Ca By <cb.list6 () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 06:29:03 -0800
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 6:11 AM Bjørn Mork <bjorn () mork no> wrote:
Ca By <cb.list6 () gmail com> writes:The 3 cellular networks in the usa, 100m subs each, use ipv6 to uniquely address customers. And in the case of ims (telephony on a celluar), it is ipv6-only, afaik.I certainly agree that this is easier and makes more sense. I just don't buy the "can't be done" wrt using rfc1918.
Well, it is not rfc1918 that is best invoked here. May i point you to rfc1925 section 2.3, regarding pigs flying with sufficient thrust. IPv4 is the pig, and a steam engined fueled by dollars is the source of thrust https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1925
Bjørn
Current thread:
- Re: DoD IP Space, (continued)
- Re: DoD IP Space Doug Barton (Feb 05)
- Re: DoD IP Space Valdis Klētnieks (Feb 05)
- Re: DoD IP Space Doug Barton (Feb 05)
- Re: DoD IP Space Owen DeLong (Feb 05)
- Re: DoD IP Space Izaac (Feb 09)
- Re: DoD IP Space Owen DeLong (Feb 10)
- Re: DoD IP Space Valdis Klētnieks (Feb 10)
- Re: DoD IP Space Ca By (Feb 10)
- Re: DoD IP Space Bjørn Mork (Feb 10)
- Re: DoD IP Space Ca By (Feb 10)
- Re: DoD IP Space Bjørn Mork (Feb 10)
- Re: DoD IP Space Ca By (Feb 10)
- Re: DoD IP Space Owen DeLong (Feb 10)
- Re: DoD IP Space Doug Barton (Feb 10)
- Re: DoD IP Space Mark Tinka (Feb 10)
- Re: DoD IP Space Randy Bush (Feb 11)
- Re: DoD IP Space Mark Tinka (Feb 11)
- Re: DoD IP Space Randy Bush (Feb 11)
- Re: DoD IP Space Mark Tinka (Feb 11)
- Re: DoD IP Space Izaac (Feb 09)
- Re: DoD IP Space Owen DeLong (Feb 10)
- Re: DoD IP Space Owen DeLong (Feb 10)
- Re: DoD IP Space Bjørn Mork (Feb 10)