nanog mailing list archives
Re: Log4j mitigation
From: Joe Greco <jgreco () ns sol net>
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2021 06:35:34 -0600
On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 01:12:25PM +0100, J??rg Kost wrote:
Yes, but it won't change the outcome. We shall run with assuming breach paradigm. In this scenario, it might be useless looking around for port 389 only; it can give you a wrong assumption.
That's like arguing that it isn't worth having a canary in the coal mine. Which, come to think of it, was implicitly the point of the message I sent that you're replying to as well. Just because there are other sources of fatalities, doesn't mean you can't check for the quick obvious stuff. In my experience, this tends to reveal issues that might have been forgotten or never known about to begin with. Most organizations have a variety of zombie legacy systems that were set up by people on staff several generations ago. The more tools at your disposal to identify breached systems, the better. ... JG -- Joe Greco - sol.net Network Services - Milwaukee, WI - http://www.sol.net "The strain of anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that 'my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge.'"-Asimov
Current thread:
- Re: Log4j mitigation, (continued)
- Re: Log4j mitigation Jörg Kost (Dec 13)
- Re: Log4j mitigation Saku Ytti (Dec 13)
- RE: Log4j mitigation Jean St-Laurent via NANOG (Dec 13)
- Re: Log4j mitigation Saku Ytti (Dec 13)
- RE: Log4j mitigation Jean St-Laurent via NANOG (Dec 13)
- Re: Log4j mitigation Jörg Kost (Dec 13)
- Re: Log4j mitigation Jörg Kost (Dec 13)
- RE: Log4j mitigation Jean St-Laurent via NANOG (Dec 13)
- Re: Log4j mitigation Joe Greco (Dec 13)
- Re: Log4j mitigation Jörg Kost (Dec 13)
- Re: Log4j mitigation Joe Greco (Dec 13)
- Re: Log4j mitigation Jörg Kost (Dec 13)
- Re: Log4j mitigation Joe Greco (Dec 13)
- Re: Log4j mitigation Jörg Kost (Dec 13)
- Re: Log4j mitigation Joe Greco (Dec 13)
- Re: Log4j mitigation Karl Auer (Dec 13)
- Re: Log4j mitigation bofh139 (Dec 13)
- Re: Log4j mitigation Hank Nussbacher (Dec 13)
- Re: Log4j mitigation Karl Auer (Dec 13)
- RE: Log4j mitigation Jean St-Laurent via NANOG (Dec 13)
- Re: Log4j mitigation A Crisan (Dec 13)