nanog mailing list archives

Re: "Tactical" /24 announcements


From: Rabbi Rob Thomas <robt () cymru com>
Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2021 13:45:56 -0400

Dear team,

I have resorted to more specific announcements during hijacks, though
with only one purpose in mind:  To buy us a bit of time while the
upstreams and peers put blocks in place to thwart the hijack as close to
the source as possible.  The more specifics are an imperfect solution,
since they don't always propagate as widely or as quickly as the
hijacks, but it buys us a bit of time.

The more important part of that solution is to network with fellow
network operators.  This is my go-to solution for everything from
hijacking to DDoS to "what the heck is that?!"  :)

Be well,
Rabbi Rob.


On 8/9/21 1:38 PM, Tom Beecher wrote:
Folks can announce longer than 24 masks all day. They're unlikely to
propagate very far though, since most won't accept longer than 24 from
the world at large.

To the OP, there are some valid reasons to strategically deaggregate
here and there, but a blanket "yolo my entire allocation into /24s"
seems to be a pretty ill considered request.

On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 1:34 PM Hank Nussbacher <hank () interall co il
<mailto:hank () interall co il>> wrote:

    On 09/08/2021 18:47, Billy Croan wrote:
    > How does the community feel about using /24 originations in BGP as a
    > tactical advantage against potential bgp hijackers?
    >
    > All of our allocations are larger and those prefixes we announce for
    > clients as well usually are.  But we had a request recently to
    > originate everything as distinct /24 prefixes, to reduce the effect of
    > a potential bgp hijack.  It seemed a little bit like a tragedy of the
    > commons situation.
    >
    > Is this seen as route table pollution, or a necessary evil in
    today's world?
    > How many routers out there today would be affected if everyone did
    this?
    > Are there any big networks that drop or penalize announcements
    like this?
    >

    In addition to what everyone else said, announcing /24s will not help
    you one bit since ASNs announce /25s, /26s, /27s, etc. Attached is a
    7800+ line text file sorted by ASN with prefixes being announced that
    are more specific than /24 (only /25+/26+/27 listed).

    This is based on http://www.ris.ripe.net/dumps/riswhoisdump.IPv4.gz
    <http://www.ris.ripe.net/dumps/riswhoisdump.IPv4.gz> from
    about a month ago.

    That dump lists all the IPv4 prefixes seen in the collective of latest
    RIS table dumps, together with origin AS and number of peers that
    passed
    the routes to RIS.

    So good luck with announcing /24s.

    Regards,
    Hank


-- 
Rabbi Rob Thomas                                           Team Cymru
   "It is easy to believe in freedom of speech for those with whom we
    agree." - Leo McKern

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Current thread: