nanog mailing list archives

Re: Setting sensible max-prefix limits


From: John Kristoff <jtk () dataplane org>
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2021 08:38:30 -0500

On Wed, 18 Aug 2021 11:33:09 +0200
Lars Prehn <lprehn () mpi-inf mpg de> wrote:

As I understand by now, it is highly recommended to set a max-prefix 
limit for peering sessions. Yet, I can hardly find any recommendations 
on how to arrive at a sensible limit.

Maybe because there isn't a simple, universal approach to setting it.
Probably like a lot of people, historically I'd set it to
some % over the current stable count and then manually adjust when the
limits were about to be breached, or often was the case when they were
and I wasn't ready for it. Not ideal.

I've never felt the automation of this setting however was worth the
effort.  Of course I am not usually responsible for hundreds of routers
and thousands of peering sessions.

At the risk of advocating for more junk in BGP or the RPKI, a max prefix
setting might be something that could be set by the announcing peer in
a BGP message, or possibly as an RPKI object with an associated ASN.
I'll let the masses debate how that would work and all the reasons that
isn't ideal, but I'm not sure there is a one-size-fit all solution for
this in the near term.

John


Current thread: