nanog mailing list archives
Re: DOD prefixes and AS8003 / GRSCORP
From: William Herrin <bill () herrin us>
Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2021 15:59:46 -0700
On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 3:01 AM Owen DeLong via NANOG <nanog () nanog org> wrote:
On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 3:35 PM Mel Beckman <mel () beckman org> wrote:I think one cause for concern is why “almost all DOD prefixes (7.0.0.0/8,11.0.0.0/8,22.0.0.0/8 and bunch of /22s) are now announced under AS8003 (GRSCORP) which was just formed a few months ago,”
I’m also not of the same belief as you that GRSCORP was just formed a few months ago.
It's not unusual to create a "cutout" or shell company to hold the network resources when the (larger) defense contractor wants to keep its identity dissociated from the Internet activity. Regards, Bill Herrin -- William Herrin bill () herrin us https://bill.herrin.us/
Current thread:
- Re: DOD prefixes and AS8003 / GRSCORP cosmo (Apr 25)
- Re: DOD prefixes and AS8003 / GRSCORP Mike Hammett (Apr 26)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: DOD prefixes and AS8003 / GRSCORP William Herrin (Apr 25)
- Re: DOD prefixes and AS8003 / GRSCORP Bryan Fields (Apr 26)
- Re: DOD prefixes and AS8003 / GRSCORP Scott Morizot (Apr 26)
- Re: DOD prefixes and AS8003 / GRSCORP John Curran (Apr 26)
- Re: DOD prefixes and AS8003 / GRSCORP John Curran (Apr 26)
- Re: DOD prefixes and AS8003 / GRSCORP Scott Morizot (Apr 26)
- Re: DOD prefixes and AS8003 / GRSCORP John Curran (Apr 26)
- Re: DOD prefixes and AS8003 / GRSCORP Scott Morizot (Apr 26)