nanog mailing list archives
Re: Zayo or HE for IP transit
From: Adam Thompson <athompson () merlin mb ca>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 16:15:39 +0000
IMHO: * Zayo = worse coverage/connectivity, adequate connectivity to other Tier1/Tier2, massive fiber network * HE = less redundancy built into their network, but best-connected to leaves/edges of the internet (and still good connectivity to core) Others may have had different experiences, but that's what I see from where I sit. -Adam Adam Thompson Consultant, Infrastructure Services [1593169877849] 100 - 135 Innovation Drive Winnipeg, MB, R3T 6A8 (204) 977-6824 or 1-800-430-6404 (MB only) athompson () merlin mb ca<mailto:athompson () merlin mb ca> www.merlin.mb.ca<http://www.merlin.mb.ca/> ________________________________ From: NANOG <nanog-bounces+athompson=merlin.mb.ca () nanog org> on behalf of James Lumby <james () jlent net> Sent: April 19, 2021 16:30 To: nanog () nanog org <nanog () nanog org> Subject: Zayo or HE for IP transit What is the current experience with Zayo or HE? I’m looking at possibly adding one of them into a mix of cogent and a mix from my datacenter. Would be using BGP full routes. Any experiences would be appreciated. Sincerely, James
Current thread:
- Zayo or HE for IP transit James Lumby (Apr 20)
- Re: Zayo or HE for IP transit Patrick W. Gilmore (Apr 20)
- RE: Zayo or HE for IP transit Luke Guillory (Apr 20)
- Re: Zayo or HE for IP transit James Jun (Apr 20)
- RE: Zayo or HE for IP transit Luke Guillory (Apr 20)
- Re: Zayo or HE for IP transit Robert Blayzor via NANOG (Apr 20)
- Re: Zayo or HE for IP transit Mike Lyon (Apr 20)
- Re: Zayo or HE for IP transit Nuno Vieira via NANOG (Apr 20)
- Re: Zayo or HE for IP transit Adam Thompson (Apr 20)
- Re: Zayo or HE for IP transit Patrick W. Gilmore (Apr 20)