nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cogent emails
From: "J. Hellenthal via NANOG" <nanog () nanog org>
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 07:58:42 -0500
geeks@nanog works just fine 😎 -- J. Hellenthal The fact that there's a highway to Hell but only a stairway to Heaven says a lot about anticipated traffic volume.
On Sep 22, 2020, at 07:53, Rich Kulawiec <rsk () gsp org> wrote: On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 06:30:24PM -0600, Grant Taylor via NANOG wrote:Is this simply being aggregated by a NANOG member / subscriber and thus something unofficial?That's exactly right. Whether NANOG itself ever wants to do anything with the results is entirely up to them. ---rsk
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: SPAM: Re: Cogent emails, (continued)
- Re: SPAM: Re: Cogent emails Tom Hill (Sep 14)
- Re: Cogent emails Dovid Bender (Sep 14)
- Re: Cogent emails Jesse DuPont (Sep 14)
- Re: Cogent emails Ryan Wilkins (Sep 14)
- Re: Cogent emails Randy Bush (Sep 14)
- Re: Cogent emails Daniel Corbe (Sep 16)
- Re: Cogent emails Grant Taylor via NANOG (Sep 21)
- Re: Cogent emails Rich Kulawiec (Sep 22)
- Re: Cogent emails J. Hellenthal via NANOG (Sep 22)
- Re: Cogent emails Rich Kulawiec (Sep 22)