Re: Redhat contact

[Guillaume Tournat via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>]


Hello

You may contact distributors instead, such as Arrow or TechData. 

Best regards

> > Le 18 sept. 2020 à 17:51, Eric Litvin <eric () lumaoptics net> a écrit :
> 
> Hi,  I need to get in contact with someone in the sales team at Redhat but they are not replying either to my emails 
> or phone calls. Do you know anyone working for Redhat whom we can call? Please dm me. 
>
> Thanks
>
> Eric  Sent from my iPhone
>
> > > On Sep 18, 2020, at 7:48 AM, Wilco Baan Hofman <wilco () baanhofman nl> wrote:
> > 
> >
> > > On 18/09/2020 12:07, Mark Tinka wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > There was a time when the use-case for MACSec was to move banks away
> > > from running their own DWDM/FC networks, and letting operators do it.
> >
> > Well, the other use case is access networks with 802.1x. With 802.1x as
> > long as the port stays up the session cookie (whatever is set as
> > authenticated) is the MAC address. So once a port is authenticated, it's
> > really easy to spoof a MAC and still be on the network.
> >
> > With WPA2 enterprise on WiFi, this problem does not exist, because then
> > there is a cryptographic session. MACsec fixes that gap on wired.
> >
> > Not all that relevant for long-distance links though :)
> >
> > -- Wilco