nanog mailing list archives
Re: IP addresses on subnet edge (/24)
From: Töma Gavrichenkov <ximaera () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 01:22:54 +0300
Peacez On Tue, Sep 15, 2020, 12:26 AM Andrey Khomyakov <khomyakov.andrey () gmail com> wrote:
TL;DR I suspect there are middle boxes that don't like IPs ending in .255. Anyone seen that?
Also .0 and .1. Yes, there was some kind of a strange behavior with those addresses before. We excluded those from rotation back in 2011 when that was really biting us. There's an impression that this issue has become much less troubling over the years, didn't have time to investigate though. -- Töma
Current thread:
- IP addresses on subnet edge (/24) Andrey Khomyakov (Sep 14)
- Re: IP addresses on subnet edge (/24) Warren Kumari (Sep 14)
- Re: IP addresses on subnet edge (/24) Tom Hill (Sep 14)
- Re: IP addresses on subnet edge (/24) Töma Gavrichenkov (Sep 14)
- Re: IP addresses on subnet edge (/24) Jeremy Visser (Sep 15)
- Re: IP addresses on subnet edge (/24) Mark Andrews (Sep 14)
- Re: IP addresses on subnet edge (/24) Robert L Mathews (Sep 14)
- RE: IP addresses on subnet edge (/24) Brian Turnbow via NANOG (Sep 15)
- RE: IP addresses on subnet edge (/24) Joe Klein (Sep 15)