nanog mailing list archives
RE: sr - spring - what's the deal with 2 names
From: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian () olddog co uk>
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2020 15:55:14 +0100
Does anyone know the scope on why we have 2 names for this ?SPRING is the IETF working group name - Source Packet Routing in Networking Segment Routing is under SPRING
Yeah, sorry, this was my fault. Gotta have a catchy name. As to "SPRINGv4" as others have said, this is not a recognised term in the IETF. I can think of it meaning a number of things (ranging from a private invention of SRv4, up to RFC 8663). You're going to have to check with the vendor using the term to find out what they mean, and possibly why they are using a new term instead of an existing one. Cheers, Adrian
Current thread:
- Re: sr - spring - what's the deal with 2 names, (continued)
- Re: sr - spring - what's the deal with 2 names Radu-Adrian Feurdean via NANOG (Sep 09)
- RE: sr - spring - what's the deal with 2 names aaron1 (Sep 09)
- Re: sr - spring - what's the deal with 2 names Radu-Adrian Feurdean (Sep 10)
- Re: sr - spring - what's the deal with 2 names Jeff Tantsura (Sep 10)
- Re: sr - spring - what's the deal with 2 names Mark Tinka (Sep 10)
- Re: sr - spring - what's the deal with 2 names Jeff Tantsura (Sep 10)
- RE: sr - spring - what's the deal with 2 names aaron1 (Sep 10)
- Re: sr - spring - what's the deal with 2 names Mark Tinka (Sep 14)
- RE: sr - spring - what's the deal with 2 names aaron1 (Sep 10)
- RE: sr - spring - what's the deal with 2 names aaron1 (Sep 10)