nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cogent Layer 2
From: Ryan Hamel <ryan () rkhtech org>
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2020 23:07:39 -0700
Yep. Make sure you run BFD with your peering protocols, to catch outages very quickly. On Oct 14 2020, at 12:47 pm, Mike Hammett <nanog () ics-il net> wrote:
I haven't heard any concerns with reliability, on-net performance (aside from 2 gig flow limit) or other such things. Do they generally deliver well in those regards? ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions (http://www.ics-il.com/) Midwest Internet Exchange (http://www.midwest-ix.com/) The Brothers WISP (http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/) From: "Mike Hammett" <nanog () ics-il net> To: nanog () nanog org Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2020 12:36:39 PM Subject: Cogent Layer 2 Are any legitimate beefs with Cogent limited to their IP policies, BGP session charges, and peering disputes? Meaning, would using them for layer 2 be reasonable? ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions (http://www.ics-il.com/) Midwest Internet Exchange (http://www.midwest-ix.com/) The Brothers WISP (http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/)
Current thread:
- Re: Cogent Layer 2, (continued)
- Re: Cogent Layer 2 Dale W. Carder (Oct 14)
- Re: Cogent Layer 2 Ryan Hamel (Oct 14)
- Re: Cogent Layer 2 Rod Beck (Oct 14)
- Re: Cogent Layer 2 Ryan Hamel (Oct 14)
- Re: Cogent Layer 2 Rod Beck (Oct 14)
- Re: Cogent Layer 2 Ryan Hamel (Oct 14)
- Re: Cogent Layer 2 Rod Beck (Oct 14)
- Re: Cogent Layer 2 Radu-Adrian Feurdean (Oct 14)
- Re: Cogent Layer 2 Rod Beck (Oct 14)
- Re: Cogent Layer 2 Ryan Hamel (Oct 14)
- Re: Cogent Layer 2 Saku Ytti (Oct 14)
- Re: Cogent Layer 2 Ryan Hamel (Oct 15)
- Re: Cogent Layer 2 Saku Ytti (Oct 15)
- Re: Cogent Layer 2 Ryan Hamel (Oct 15)
- Re: Cogent Layer 2 Saku Ytti (Oct 15)