nanog mailing list archives

Re: alternative to voip gateways


From: Mike Hammett <nanog () ics-il net>
Date: Mon, 4 May 2020 06:21:27 -0500 (CDT)

The Calix and Occam systems are web based. I find the Occam interface easier, but I've used it longer. 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 

Midwest Internet Exchange 

The Brothers WISP 

----- Original Message -----

From: "Nick Edwards" <nick.z.edwards () gmail com> 
To: "Mike Hammett" <nanog () ics-il net> 
Cc: nanog () nanog org 
Sent: Monday, May 4, 2020 5:06:28 AM 
Subject: Re: alternative to voip gateways 

Thanks, this seems far more cost effective. 
But what about configuration, is it easy enough to configure? 

I'm told it must be simple to config and understand and if possible 
web based (im told because I may not always be available they want 
their basic IT staff to be able to understand and if need be make 
changes - which that alone scares me none of them understand anything 
other than windows) 

Thanks for all the suggestions 

On 5/3/20, Mike Hammett <nanog () ics-il net> wrote: 
If you were to outfit them with three chassis of Calix\Occam B6-252s, you'd 
be under $25k for the whole thing and get ADSL2+ speeds. You would need most 
of a rack to do it. 


Other platforms may or may not be more cost effective or a better solution. 
Just throwing the idea out there. 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 

Midwest Internet Exchange 

The Brothers WISP 

----- Original Message ----- 

From: "Nick Edwards" <nick.z.edwards () gmail com> 
To: "Jeremy Austin" <jhaustin () gmail com> 
Cc: nanog () nanog org 
Sent: Sunday, May 3, 2020 12:21:17 AM 
Subject: Re: alternative to voip gateways 

The huts or cabins whatever you want to call them, are right behind 
the admin building at entrance, so first is about 300 meters and the 
furtherest is just under 1 mile 

Cost will be an issue, Im sure I will have no problems if I have to 
install a full rack of gateways and another full of dslams if it costs 
150K, over something 1/5th the size in one rack that will cost 200k - 
since the company is not charging them for internet or voice. 

On 5/2/20, Jeremy Austin <jhaustin () gmail com> wrote: 
What’s the average loop length? Grandstream is probably OK to 5+ kfeet but 

you will lose CID before that. 

As the low cost option don’t expect them to be trouble-free (or have 
particularly good vendor support), but they might work in your application 

if cheap is what makes sense. 

My $.02 

Jeremy Austin 

On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 10:11 PM Andrey Slastenov <a.slastenov () gmail com> 
wrote: 

Look at MSAN solution. Like Huawei UA5000 or similar solutions from other 

vendors. 


Regards, 
Andrey 

2 мая 2020 г., в 07:21, Nick Edwards <nick.z.edwards () gmail com> 
написал(а): 

I'm looking at a new sister company we just took over, their remote 
village has 1700 analogue phone lines to the workers huts, but they go 

nowhere past the MDF. 

The office runs voip, now i'm told i have to get phones to the workers 

because the <lots of explicit words> AKA previous owners of that 
business stopped the build when they ran into financial problems. 

So my plan is to utilize the existing many miles worth of copper pairs. 


I'm looking at throwing them into Versa Dslams that use pppoe pass 
through, throw in a mikoTik 1036 as pppoe server, and we got spare 
R710 i can use as radius server, and by my limited knowledge this 
works. 

OK data done, but... now all those pots out lines need to go somewhere 

that can handle 1700 or more lines, I am looking at either grandstream 

48 port FXS gateways or sangoma vega 50 ports (which Ill use as 48 so 
theres a 1:1 match with dslams) the vega 3050 probably wont be used 
because they are more than twice the price of grandstream. 

But this all results in a sh1te load of 48 port gateways (power is not 

a concern), but wondering if there is another solution that is more 
cost effective? Seems the regular NEC's Siemens and so on might have 
an option but I can imagine it will be far more expensive than a bunch 

of individual gateways. 

This project is in my mind workable, but i've not done such a thing on 

a large scale. 
Those who have experience in this field care to chime in? is my method 

acceptable or not for such a project size? 

most pbx's I've done are only few hundred analogue lines where 
gateways are more suited and definitely more cost effective, at all 
our locations we use freepbx which works perfectly, and we know the 
beefyness of the box we'll need to install to handle this load, thats 
not a problem if we go down the gateway method. 

thoughts? 

-- 
Jeremy Austin 
jhaustin () gmail com 





Current thread: