nanog mailing list archives

Re: RIPE NCC Executive Board election


From: Ryan Hamel <ryan () rkhtech org>
Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 15:04:04 -0700

Elad,

It's those kinds of quick accusations that are damaging your reputation.
To boil your three ideas down to a sentence, they're throwing pixie dust on top of existing technologies, instead of 
embracing the current feature set that has existed for decades.
I mentioned BCP38 as a method around spoofed DDOS attacks on RIPE, and your IPv4+ idea is only keeping IPv4 around 
longer than it should.
IPv6 has been around for decades, and battle tested with major companies like Digital Equipment Corporation in the 
90's. If you want your ideas to gain any sort of foothold, write the code demonstrating a proof of concept with a 
couple of Linux VMs, showing off the client and router changes, and release it for the community to play around with.
Actions speak louder than words. Just like RIPE votes, and listing your email address as spam.
Have a good one.
Ryan Hamel
On May 13 2020, at 2:39 pm, Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com> wrote:

On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 5:35 PM Elad Cohen <elad () netstyle io> wrote:

Another member of the illegal anonymous organization "The Spamhaus Project".
wait, what?
________________________________
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2020 12:34 AM
To: Elad Cohen <elad () netstyle io>
Cc: David Hubbard <dhubbard () dino hostasaurus com>; nanog () nanog org <nanog () nanog org>
Subject: Re: RIPE NCC Executive Board election

admins, can we can this worm can back and .. get back to work ?
kthxbi.

On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 5:29 PM Elad Cohen <elad () netstyle io> wrote:

LOL so much heat and lies from IPv6 fans that don't want IPv4+ to be deployed.
________________________________
From: NANOG <nanog-bounces () nanog org> on behalf of David Hubbard <dhubbard () dino hostasaurus com>
Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2020 12:10 AM
To: nanog () nanog org <nanog () nanog org>
Subject: Re: RIPE NCC Executive Board election


I suspect he’d want to slow adoption and push his frankestein IPv4 because any extension of IPv4 use makes the 
netblocks’s he’s obtained questionable ‘ownership’ of more valuable, in theory.


From: NANOG <nanog-bounces+dhubbard=dino.hostasaurus.com () nanog org> on behalf of Baldur Norddahl 
<baldur.norddahl () gmail com>
Date: Wednesday, May 13, 2020 at 5:02 PM
To: "nanog () nanog org" <nanog () nanog org>
Subject: Re: RIPE NCC Executive Board election



Akamai already has 15% peak IPv6 traffic:


https://blogs.akamai.com/2020/02/at-21-tbps-reaching-new-levels-of-ipv6-traffic.html


Some internet service providers may have more than half of their traffic as IPv6.


Some countries are now crossing more than 50% IPv6 availability:


https://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics.html


Why do you think you can overtake the IPv6 train? Why would we want to abandon the work already done?

Current thread: