nanog mailing list archives
Re: UDP/123 policers & status
From: Saku Ytti <saku () ytti fi>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2020 12:08:38 +0300
On Mon, 30 Mar 2020 at 11:56, Harlan Stenn <stenn () nwtime org> wrote:
OK, and exactly how bad is a single byte attenuation, when compared against the cost of 100% of all of the 1-byte shorter NTP packets being made bigger to make the attenuation vector 0?
I can't parse that, sorry. I'm saying attenuation of 1B or more is good, no attenuation or amplification is worse. -- ++ytti
Current thread:
- Re: UDP/123 policers & status, (continued)
- Re: UDP/123 policers & status Ragnar Sundblad (Mar 29)
- Re: UDP/123 policers & status Harlan Stenn (Mar 28)
- Re: UDP/123 policers & status Harlan Stenn (Mar 28)
- Re: UDP/123 policers & status Ragnar Sundblad (Mar 29)
- Re: UDP/123 policers & status Harlan Stenn (Mar 28)
- Re: UDP/123 policers & status Ragnar Sundblad (Mar 29)
- Re: UDP/123 policers & status Saku Ytti (Mar 29)
- Re: UDP/123 policers & status Harlan Stenn (Mar 30)
- Re: UDP/123 policers & status Saku Ytti (Mar 30)
- Re: UDP/123 policers & status Harlan Stenn (Mar 30)
- Re: UDP/123 policers & status Saku Ytti (Mar 30)
- Re: UDP/123 policers & status Ragnar Sundblad (Mar 30)
- Re: UDP/123 policers & status Harlan Stenn (Mar 30)
- Re: UDP/123 policers & status Saku Ytti (Mar 30)
- Re: UDP/123 policers & status Ragnar Sundblad (Mar 30)
- Re: UDP/123 policers & status Ragnar Sundblad (Mar 29)