nanog mailing list archives
Re: Sunday traffic curiosity
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu () gmail com>
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2020 21:41:25 +0100
Le 22/03/2020 à 21:31, Nick Hilliard a écrit :
Grant Taylor via NANOG wrote on 22/03/2020 19:17:What was wrong with Internet scale multicast? Why did it get abandoned?there wasn't any problem with inter-domain multicast that couldn't be resolved by handing over to level 3 engineering and the vendor's support escalation team.But then again, there weren't many problems with inter-domain multicast that could be resolved without handing over to level 3 engineering and the vendor's support escalation team.Nick
For my part I speculate multicast did not take off at any level (inter domain, intra domain) because pipes grew larger (more bandwidth) faster than uses ever needed. Even now, I dont hear problems of bandwidth from some end users, like friends using netflix. I do hear in media that there _might_ be an issue of capacity, but I did not hear that from end users.
On another hand, link-local multicast does seem to work ok, at least with IPv6. The problem it solves there is not related to the width of the pipe, but more to resistance against 'storms' that were witnessed during ARP storms. I could guess that Ethernet pipes are now so large they could accomodate many forms of ARP storms, but for one reason or another IPv6 ND has multicast and no broadcast. It might even be a problem in the name, in that it is named 'IPv6 multicast ND' but underlying is often implemented with pure broadcast and local filters.
If the capacity is reached and if end users need more, then there are two alternative solutions: grow capacity unicast (e.g. 1Tb/s Ethernet) or multicast; it's useless to do both. If we cant do 1 Tb/s Ethernet ('apocalypse' was called by some?) then we'll do multicast.
I think, Alex, LF/HF 3
Current thread:
- Sunday traffic curiosity Andy Ringsmuth (Mar 22)
- Re: Sunday traffic curiosity Owen DeLong (Mar 22)
- Re: Sunday traffic curiosity nanog (Mar 22)
- Message not available
- Re: Sunday traffic curiosity John Kristoff (Mar 22)
- Re: Sunday traffic curiosity Grant Taylor via NANOG (Mar 22)
- Re: Sunday traffic curiosity Saku Ytti (Mar 22)
- Re: Sunday traffic curiosity Matt Hoppes (Mar 22)
- Re: Sunday traffic curiosity Nick Hilliard (Mar 22)
- Re: Sunday traffic curiosity Alexandre Petrescu (Mar 22)
- Re: Sunday traffic curiosity Saku Ytti (Mar 22)
- RE: Sunday traffic curiosity Aaron Gould (Mar 22)
- Re: Sunday traffic curiosity Mark Tinka (Mar 22)
- Re: Sunday traffic curiosity Alexandre Petrescu (Mar 23)
- Re: Sunday traffic curiosity Josh Luthman (Mar 23)
- Re: Sunday traffic curiosity Alexandre Petrescu (Mar 23)
- Re: Sunday traffic curiosity Mark Tinka (Mar 23)
- RE: Sunday traffic curiosity Keith Medcalf (Mar 23)
- Re: Sunday traffic curiosity John Kristoff (Mar 22)
- Re: Sunday traffic curiosity Owen DeLong (Mar 22)
- Re: Sunday traffic curiosity Owen DeLong (Mar 22)
- Re: Sunday traffic curiosity Valdis Klētnieks (Mar 22)