nanog mailing list archives
Re: WIKI documentation Software?
From: Yang Yu <yang.yu.list () gmail com>
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2020 04:59:27 -0700
On Sat, Mar 14, 2020 at 7:07 AM Brielle <bruns () 2mbit com> wrote:
I personally like Dokuwiki a lot. From a usability standpoint, once you spend a few learning the interface, it’s very simplistic and not overwhelming in features. You can always add extensions for stuff you need that isn’t there out of box. From a technical standpoint, it doesn’t need a database. The entire structure is text files, so it can be run on even a super small VM, and doing backups is as easy as tarballing the data directory. It’s got support for LDAP for authentication too, which might be useful.
+1 for dokuwiki easy to maintain, has enough features while not become distracting only complaint is that it doesn't support markdown, but the syntax is easy enough (much easier than MediaWiki imo)
Current thread:
- WIKI documentation Software? Craig (Mar 14)
- Re: WIKI documentation Software? Josh Baird (Mar 14)
- Re: WIKI documentation Software? Gavin Henry (Mar 14)
- Re: WIKI documentation Software? Karl Auer (Mar 14)
- Re: WIKI documentation Software? Brielle (Mar 14)
- Re: WIKI documentation Software? Bill Woodcock (Mar 14)
- Re: WIKI documentation Software? Yang Yu (Mar 15)
- Re: WIKI documentation Software? Grimes, Greg (Mar 15)
- Re: WIKI documentation Software? Andrew Latham (Mar 15)
- Re: WIKI documentation Software? Brielle (Mar 14)
- Re: WIKI documentation Software? Eric Kuhnke (Mar 17)
- Re: WIKI documentation Software? Josh Baird (Mar 14)
- Re: WIKI documentation Software? Craig (Mar 14)
- RE: WIKI documentation Software? Ray Orsini (Mar 14)
- Re: WIKI documentation Software? Anurag Bhatia (Mar 14)
- Re: WIKI documentation Software? Gavin Henry (Mar 14)
- Re: WIKI documentation Software? nanog08 (Mar 14)
- Re: WIKI documentation Software? Adam Kennedy via NANOG (Mar 14)