nanog mailing list archives
Re: understanding IPv6
From: "Harald Koch" <chk () pobox com>
Date: Sun, 07 Jun 2020 22:41:00 -0400
On Sun, Jun 7, 2020, at 12:02, Brandon Martin wrote:
This is difficult to understate. "People" are continually amazed when I show them that I can leave TCP sessions up for days at a time (with properly configured endpoints) with absolutely zero keepalive traffic being exchanged.
On the other hand, I'm constantly having to remind developers at $job that while this may be normal, it's not guaranteed, and they need to deal with TCP sessions that go down without requiring operator intervention. Reliable networks do not teach developers about fault tolerance ;) -- Harald
Current thread:
- Re: understanding IPv6, (continued)
- Re: understanding IPv6 Denys Fedoryshchenko (Jun 07)
- Re: understanding IPv6 Brandon Martin (Jun 07)
- Re: understanding IPv6 Denys Fedoryshchenko (Jun 07)
- Re: understanding IPv6 Etienne-Victor Depasquale (Jun 07)
- Re: understanding IPv6 Joel Halpern (Jun 07)
- Re: understanding IPv6 Baldur Norddahl (Jun 07)
- Re: understanding IPv6 Etienne-Victor Depasquale (Jun 07)
- Re: understanding IPv6 Pascal Thubert (pthubert) via NANOG (Jun 08)
- Re: understanding IPv6 Pascal Thubert (pthubert) via NANOG (Jun 08)
- Re: understanding IPv6 Etienne-Victor Depasquale (Jun 07)
- Re: understanding IPv6 Harald Koch (Jun 07)
- Re: understanding IPv6 William Herrin (Jun 07)
- RE: understanding IPv6 Keith Medcalf (Jun 07)
- Re: understanding IPv6 Bjørn Mork (Jun 07)
- Re: understanding IPv6 Daniel Sterling (Jun 07)
- Re: understanding IPv6 Bjørn Mork (Jun 07)