nanog mailing list archives
Re: ROV Deployment (was LDPv6 Census Check)
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 08:50:26 -0700
when Google got people worried about dropping routes.That may have an impact down the road, but I doubt that really had that much impact on current deployments.
i suspect different folk moved for various reasons. i appreciate the motion. while things are moving, the problem is that technical deployment sucks badly, from the arin disaster to broken relying party software to broken router implementations; i.e. every step in the chain. the only reason the mess is not blatantly visible is the fail soft design, aka notFound. the problem with fail soft is that you think you are protected when you are not. my inner naggumite is starting to wonder if fail soft was a mistake. randy
Current thread:
- ROV Deployment (was LDPv6 Census Check) Randy Bush (Jun 14)
- Re: ROV Deployment (was LDPv6 Census Check) Mark Tinka (Jun 16)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: ROV Deployment (was LDPv6 Census Check) John Kristoff (Jun 16)
- Re: ROV Deployment (was LDPv6 Census Check) Dorian Kim (Jun 16)
- Re: ROV Deployment (was LDPv6 Census Check) Randy Bush (Jun 16)
- Re: ROV Deployment (was LDPv6 Census Check) Christopher Morrow (Jun 16)
- Re: ROV Deployment (was LDPv6 Census Check) Dorian Kim (Jun 16)