Re: MAP-T in production

[Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf () gmail com>]

For the record, we are asking similar questions about 464XLAT in v6ops. If you are deploying it, please advise Jordi 
Palet Martinez.

For those unfamiliar with them, MAP-T and 464XLAT are each deployment frameworks for IPv4/IPv6 translation, as 
described in RFCs 4164, 4166, 4167, and 7915.

Sent from my iPad

> On Jul 22, 2020, at 2:16 PM, Brian Johnson <brian.johnson () netgeek us> wrote:
>
> Has anyone implemented a MAP-T solution in production? I am looking for feedback on this as a deployment strategy 
> for an IPv6 only core design. My concern is MAP-T CE stability and overhead on the network. The BR will have to do 
> overloaded NAT anyway to access IPv4 only resources. The idea being that when IPv4 is no longer needed, this will be 
> a quicker “clean-up” project than a dual-stack solution.
>
> I have reviewed Jordan Gotlieb’s presentation from Charter and would love to hear if this is still in use at Charter 
> or if was ever fully implemented and the experiences)
>
> I’d love any real life examples and success/failure stories.
>
> Thanks.
>
> - Brian