Re: De-bogonising 2a10::/12

[Mirjam Kuehne <mir () ripe net>]

Dear colleagues,

Following the announcement of our plans to debogonise 2a10::/12, we have
now shared the results of the tests we've been carrying out to check the
usability of address space in this block. Read all about it on RIPE Labs:

https://labs.ripe.net/Members/emileaben/the-debogonisation-of-2a10-12

Kind regards,
Mirjam Kühne
RIPE NCC


On 16/01/2020 09:07, Emile Aben wrote:
> Dear colleagues,
>
> We have now started de-bogonising 2a10::/12!
>
> As part of this, we are announcing a couple of prefixes out of 2a10::/12
> from AS12654 (RIPE's Routing Information Service, RIS). Pingable targets
> have been configured in these prefixes, and we invite network operators
> to test for themselves whether this address space is reachable.
>
> The simplest way to do this would be to perform a ping6 to 2a10:4::1 .
>
> Using RIPE Atlas and RIS, we will also be carrying out our own tests in
> order to investigate connectivity and filtering for this address space.
> We plan to share our results with the RIPE community via RIPE Labs
> within the next few days.
>
> For those who want to do other testing, beyond the basic test described
> above, we have a total of 8 targets available for this, with 2 different
> prefix lengths and all variations of having ROUTE objects in the RIPE DB
> and/or ROAs.
>
> 2a10:3:4::1  /48 ROUTE object + ROA
> 2a10:3:5::1  /48 no ROUTE object + ROA
> 2a10:3:6::1  /48 ROUTE object + no ROA
> 2a10:3:7::1  /48 no ROUTE object + no ROA
>
> 2a10:4::1    /32 ROUTE object + ROA
> 2a10:5::1    /32 no ROUTE object + ROA
> 2a10:6::1    /32 ROUTE object + no ROA
> 2a10:7::1    /32 no ROUTE object + no ROA
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Emile Aben
> RIPE NCC