nanog mailing list archives
Re: TCP-AMP DDoS Attack - Fake abuse reports problem
From: Damian Menscher via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2020 20:17:27 -0800
On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 3:40 PM Jean | ddostest.me via NANOG < nanog () nanog org> wrote:
It doesn't sound to be a real amplification.. If it is, can anyone provide the amplification factor? 1x? It sounds more like a TCP spoofing.
Some reading for you: https://www.usenix.org/conference/woot14/workshop-program/presentation/kuhrer Damian
Current thread:
- TCP-AMP DDoS Attack - Fake abuse reports problem Octolus Development (Feb 20)
- Re: TCP-AMP DDoS Attack - Fake abuse reports problem Töma Gavrichenkov (Feb 20)
- Message not available
- Re: Forest HQ Has Received Your Message: Re: TCP-AMP DDoS Attack - Fake abuse reports problem Töma Gavrichenkov (Feb 20)
- Message not available
- Re: TCP-AMP DDoS Attack - Fake abuse reports problem Filip Hruska (Feb 20)
- Re: TCP-AMP DDoS Attack - Fake abuse reports problem Töma Gavrichenkov (Feb 20)
- Re: TCP-AMP DDoS Attack - Fake abuse reports problem Jean | ddostest.me via NANOG (Feb 20)
- Re: TCP-AMP DDoS Attack - Fake abuse reports problem Damian Menscher via NANOG (Feb 20)
- Re: TCP-AMP DDoS Attack - Fake abuse reports problem Tom Beecher (Feb 21)
- Re: TCP-AMP DDoS Attack - Fake abuse reports problem Bottiger (Feb 24)
- Re: TCP-AMP DDoS Attack - Fake abuse reports problem Töma Gavrichenkov (Feb 20)
- Re: TCP-AMP DDoS Attack - Fake abuse reports problem Damian Menscher via NANOG (Feb 20)
- Re: TCP-AMP DDoS Attack - Fake abuse reports problem Amir Herzberg (Feb 21)
- Re: TCP-AMP DDoS Attack - Fake abuse reports problem Denys Fedoryshchenko (Feb 21)