nanog mailing list archives
Re: QUIC traffic throttled on AT&T residential
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta () necom830 hpcl titech ac jp>
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 11:05:08 +0900
Daniel Sterling wrote:
A problem of QUIC with NAT is that existing NAT can not detect graceful shutdown of QUIC and must depends on timeout. So, port numbers may be used up before timeout.Hmm, this is not what is happening.
I thought so. My point is that the problem can be another reason to avoid QUIC. Masataka Ohta
Current thread:
- Re: QUIC traffic throttled on AT&T residential, (continued)
- Re: QUIC traffic throttled on AT&T residential Matthew Kaufman (Feb 20)
- Re: QUIC traffic throttled on AT&T residential Dan Wing (Feb 21)
- Re: QUIC traffic throttled on AT&T residential Jared Mauch (Feb 21)
- Re: [External] Re: QUIC traffic throttled on AT&T residential Hunter Fuller (Feb 21)
- Re: [External] Re: QUIC traffic throttled on AT&T residential Ca By (Feb 21)
- Re: QUIC traffic throttled on AT&T residential Łukasz Bromirski (Feb 21)
- Re: QUIC traffic throttled on AT&T residential Matthew Petach (Feb 21)
- Re: QUIC traffic throttled on AT&T residential Owen DeLong (Feb 21)
- Re: QUIC traffic throttled on AT&T residential Paul Timmins (Feb 26)
- Re: QUIC traffic throttled on AT&T residential Łukasz Bromirski (Feb 21)
- Re: QUIC traffic throttled on AT&T residential Masataka Ohta (Feb 20)
- Re: QUIC traffic throttled on AT&T residential Masataka Ohta (Feb 18)
- Re: QUIC traffic throttled on AT&T residential Michael Brown (Feb 19)
- Re: QUIC traffic throttled on AT&T residential Daniel Sterling (Feb 18)
- Re: QUIC traffic throttled on AT&T residential Daniel Sterling (Feb 19)
- Re: QUIC traffic throttled on AT&T residential Blake Hudson (Feb 19)
- Re: QUIC traffic throttled on AT&T residential Daniel Sterling (Feb 19)
- Re: QUIC traffic throttled on AT&T residential Blake Hudson (Feb 20)
- Re: QUIC traffic throttled on AT&T residential Ca By (Feb 20)