nanog mailing list archives
Re: CISCO 0-day exploits
From: Tom Hill <tom () ninjabadger net>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2020 15:24:16 +0000
On 10/02/2020 13:40, Saku Ytti wrote:
There are various L3 packet of deaths where existing infra can be crashed with single packet, almost everyone has no or ridiculously broken iACL and control-plane protection, yet business does not seem to suffer from it.
The cynic in me would suggest that we haven't had a World War in a while; business is far too good. -- Tom
Current thread:
- CISCO 0-day exploits Jean | ddostest.me via NANOG (Feb 07)
- Re: CISCO 0-day exploits Jean | ddostest.me via NANOG (Feb 10)
- Re: CISCO 0-day exploits tim () pelican org (Feb 10)
- Re: CISCO 0-day exploits Saku Ytti (Feb 10)
- Re: CISCO 0-day exploits Jean | ddostest.me via NANOG (Feb 10)
- Re: CISCO 0-day exploits Tom Hill (Feb 10)
- Re: CISCO 0-day exploits Ahmed Borno (Feb 10)
- Re: CISCO 0-day exploits Saku Ytti (Feb 11)
- Re: CISCO 0-day exploits Harlan Stenn (Feb 11)
- Re: CISCO 0-day exploits Ahmed Borno (Feb 11)
- Re: CISCO 0-day exploits Saku Ytti (Feb 11)
- Re: CISCO 0-day exploits Ahmed Borno (Feb 11)
- Re: CISCO 0-day exploits sronan (Feb 11)
- Re: CISCO 0-day exploits Jean | ddostest.me via NANOG (Feb 10)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: CISCO 0-day exploits Scott Weeks (Feb 10)
- Re: CISCO 0-day exploits Justin Wilson (Feb 10)
- Re: CISCO 0-day exploits Tom Hill (Feb 10)